![]() Studies will be retrieved from the following academic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Global Health, ProQuest Social Science and Web of Science. This review will include empirical studies measuring variations of acculturation and mental health among adult forced migrants from low- and middle-income countries residing in high-income countries. We will use a meta-narrative approach to synthesise the breadth of acculturation and mental health literature from various research traditions. Research questions include the following: (1) How is acculturation conceptualised? (2) What are the most salient mental health outcomes? (3) How are acculturation and mental health measured and related? and (4) How do macrostructural factors affect the relationship between mental health and acculturation? Methods Many forced migrants have an increased risk of experiencing negative mental health outcomes, but this review will only assess the current literature on acculturation and mental health among adults. There is a growing need to investigate how acculturation impacts mental health among asylum seekers and refugees. ![]() DOI: 10.1111/J. global refugee crisis has become central to health and policy debates. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. What remains unknown recommendations for future research What is known recommendations for practice. Quality assessment of studies within component reviews and/or of reviews themselves Identification of component reviews, but no search for primary studies Focuses on a broad condition or problem for which there are competing interventions and highlights reviews that address these interventions and their results Specifically refers to review compiling evidence from multiple reviews into one accessible and usable document. May also employ graphical means of integrating quantitative and qualitative studiesĪnalysis may characterize both works of literature and look for correlations between characteristics or use gap analysis to identify aspects absent in one literature but missing in the other Typically both components will be presented as narrative and in tables. Requires either a generic appraisal instrument or separate appraisal processes with corresponding checklists Requires either very sensitive search to retrieve all studies or separately conceived quantitative and qualitative strategies Within a review context, it refers to a combination of review approaches for example combining quantitative with qualitative research or outcome with process studies Refers to any combination of methods where one significant component is a literature review (usually systematic). Mixed studies review/mixed methods review Typically tabular with some narrative commentaryĬharacterizes quantity and quality of literature, perhaps by study design and other key features. Aims to identify the nature and extent of research evidence (usually including ongoing research)Ĭompleteness of searching determined by time/scope constraints. Preliminary assessment of potential size and scope of available research literature. Numerical analysis of measures of effect assuming absence of heterogeneity Graphical and tabular with narrative commentary Quality assessment may determine inclusion/exclusion and/or sensitivity analyses May use funnel plot to assess completeness Technique that statistically combines the results of quantitative studies to provide a more precise effect of the resultsĪims for exhaustive searching. What remains unknown uncertainty around findings, recommendations for Seeks to systematically search for, appraise and synthesize research evidence, often adhering to guidelines on the conduct of a reviewįor practice. May include research findingsĪnalysis may be chronological, conceptual, thematic, etc. Can cover a wide range of subjects at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness. Generic term: published materials that provide an examination of recent or current literature. The following provides a comparison of common review types. However, there are over 100 different kinds of reviews to choose from. Conducting effective reviews is essential to advance the knowledge and understand the breadth of research on a topic synthesize existing evidence develop theories or provide a conceptual background for subsequent research and identify research gaps.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |